About feminism as a social phenomenon

Feminists are convinced that men are evil, and it began with Adam, who, with the help of rough physical strength, pushed Eve Apple into his mouth. The poor thing was actually raped!

Such aggression should be responded with even greater aggression – and now the normal women who are already taught by feminists go to a man, like sailors on an embrasure, dive, like Gastello to a train, and are ready to crawl to their female happiness, like Meresyev. Do not crawl! Men cannot tolerate feminism with all the fibers of their harsh unshaven soul. As a representative of this glorious, often incorrectly understood by women of the tribe, is ready to explain – why.

The first knife. I hate feminists for considering themselves smarter than men.

In fact, evidence of their mind is zero in the period (I’m afraid that feminists will not be able to appreciate this joke). What men created by the power of their thoughts? All! From the engine, thanks to which feminists get to their aggressive gatherings, to the Internet, which they clog with their delusional sites. From weaving machines, thanks to which feminists cover their sexual characteristics, to the jacuzzi, in which they come to their senses after stress, which is applied by the next fact of the presence of men on the planet. Now tell me that the sisters created them on the floor? Ladies magazines are very fond of painting stories about the most famous women of the planet. Well offhand, about whom they talk for the hundredth time? Yes, this simple set is Cleopatra, Madame Pompadur, Mata Hari, Lily Brik, Gala Dali, Princess Diana. That is, either an adventurer, or an affair, or a nympho, or a loafer, or all the qualities in one bottle. And everyone rose at the expense of men, by their heads. Who would know about Pompadur at all, if not Louis? About Lila Brik, don’t be Mayakovsky? Oh Gala, don’t be salvador? And finally, about Diana, do not jump out of marriage to Charles? What would have left in history from Cleopatra without Caesar and without her habit of selling their nights for a carcass of a lover in the morning?

The heights that women were able to take in the literature is a primitive fairy tale about a bespectacled man on a broomstick and a naive confession of aunt, which is not able to lose weight. Where is Shakespeare in a skirt? Where is Dostoevsky in the topic? Where is Tolstoy in a bikini (the distant heiress is his fat in this size certainly does not fit)? All female literature – tears, roses, thunderstorms and frosts. All female poetry is an eternal lamentation on the topic “My dear that I did to you?“, Where the only difference is in the variety of size and rhyme. The heights that women were able to take in mathematics are focused around the same surname-Sofia Kovalevskaya, who is probably tired of spinning in the coffin, acting as the only argument in favor of women-scientists. The heights that women were able to take in physics are spinning around Mary of the Sklodovskaya-Kuri, who, by the way, did not have a single experience without her husband. We move on. Chemistry? Medicine? Biology? Not a single female name comes to memory.

(I’m not going to talk here about the authors of the second and third-story scientific works. Having rummaged in thick reference books, you can probably stumble upon some female names, which is not surprising-scientists of the men are pretty laboratory laboratory and ready to take them to co-authors, paying for their weakness). And all because women are worthless creators. They can be good, sometimes even very diligent performers. But with their ideas they have tight. This is not Valya Tereshkova went on a rocket into space. This man sent Valya on the rocket he had created, after the squirrel and arrows were convinced that the woman would not shift anything so terrible in space. What can I say, even if in the original female sphere the male faces are ruled! Take high fashion houses-Saint-Loran, Versace, Dior, Gauthier, Armani, Gucci, Yamomoto, Cavalli, Dolce, Gaban, Ford … And on behalf of the women they are opposed by one-unit Coco Chanel. It is not surprising that many of these men are no longer very much and men. The guys are stressed by the fact that they are forced to take on a woman’s craft ..

The second knife. I hate feminists because they produce pseudo -puzzles.

What is a pseudo -fenger? This is such a woman, which has already been abandoned or has not yet been selected. From this, she terribly complexs, worries, experiences a feeling of burning hatred for all men and rowing them under one comb. Ah, you don’t like me? Ah, you exchanged me for another? And the worse I am? Why Masha got married with crooked legs, but I don’t. Why. Why. Why. In general, she has a permanent tantrum and an obsessive idea that something needs to be done, no matter what, the main thing is as soon as possible. And she is already gathering visits to a psychotherapist, a science, an astrologer, a fortuneteller and even signed up for Life Spring, as a school girlfriend gives her the address of a local feminist club. And there, from the rostrum during the report “Male betrayal and its role in the life of a modern woman”, she finally informed her the reason for all her troubles, about which she already implicitly guessed: all men are goats. And she becomes so good. And from the rostrum they already say that you should not wait for merits from nature, take them from her task and push them about the phallocratic society and announce the instructions for building female happiness on the scale of the universe and its apartment in particular. Having hung her ears, she lustfully listens to the speaker and the less understands, the more she respects her.

Think about why she was actually abandoned, she lacks the mind, and if enough, then laziness is working on herself. But it’s not too lazy under the auspices of the feminist club to carry out some moronic pons inoproxhes, ropen the pseudo-scientific and imaginary polar brochure “How to find a man of your dreams and what to do with this scum”, count on the calculator how many times the words “Windows” have the words “Baba” and “Fool” … She is convinced that the results of these references were convincedThey will cause the effect of an exploding bomb and end with a thermonuclear apocalypse, during which the members will tear off all the males.

And she is almost healthy – in her eyes shine, chest forward, the ass is protruded. She is no longer up to internal experiences, because the vacuum inside her wounded soul was filled with the feministic Beliberd, and even the word “promiscuity” she had already learned to pronounce without hesitation. She grows on herself, she is engaged in scientific work, she is wealthy, and not flawed, and that it is not married so even good, because not in marriage happiness, but in freedom. In general, I wanted to be deceived and deceived.

In short, all this helps her a lot during the crisis and has a marvelous therapeutic effect. She treats everyone, teaches, loads, proclaims “give the feminization of the planet of three years”, makes his way to newspapers with interviews “I would castle men on fire” and leads to TV “how to choose the right dildo and the better he is a man”. Popularity comes to her, and then male attention.

Which is noteworthy, she is no longer selected. She chooses. And, having tried 30 people, stops his choice on a slow, attractive, wealthy. And all … as cut off. There was a feminist and all went out. As, by the wave of a magic wand, she becomes a weak woman and does not work, because she is a weak woman, and does not clean (well, you do it much better, my smack-chok is sweet). For the same reason, she does not wash the dishes (she needs to read “Cosmopolitan” and “Lilith” to grow over herself). Now her favorite saying “man is the head”, and you are increasingly remembering about a woman with a cart, which is easier to mare. A mare is you, more precisely, not a mare, but a donkey, because you are sutured in two works, survived a heart attack on your feet, and you still need to have time to buy diapers for children while it grows over itself. But one fine day you rebel, send such a life away. And then she, in order to re -chop her feminine happiness, takes out a dusty suit of feminists from a suitcase and again begins tyrannoye with males to find another idiot.

The third knife. I hate feminists because they want to let us in the world.

Alas, not in the sense of sending us on a cruise on a white steamer. Literally. At the same time, they come up with such sophisticated ways as cleansing our accounts and pockets from money -knowing that they would envy the Ostap Bender.

On the American continent, they have long earned on feminism on a piece of bread with butter, caviar and lemon from above. There are feminists – the most successful judges. For example, in Toronto, a couple of feminists threw off the bras and, fanning from the summer heat with breasts, went to the park for the promenade. There their police officers and took warm and sweaty. And the feminists were necessary. They immediately went to court: discrimination! Why men can pump the upper body, but they do not? Give moral compensation in material terms. And Dali. Although I personally are very curious – how much a man would earn, he go to the same park in thongs or a bra. I think that at least 15 days for violation of public order would be flaw. Where is justice?

The student is all in the same Toronto (men, remember this hype!) I sued the old professional, who during the exam looked at her too closely. I spun grandfather for 200 thousand Canadian dollars. For what? For „excessive visual contact“ – the term invented by feminists. What can be advised to the poor Canadian professor? Do not look at students at all? But, excuse me, figs! Not in the way. In this case, cunning feminists came up with the opposite accusation – „in insufficient visual contact“. Like, if a man avoids a woman’s gaze, the poor thing can develop an inferiority complex. As a result, the entire Canadian professor is just sobbing. Where he looks – it is unclear, and this is saved.

What can I say … To https://nonukcasinosites.co.uk/500-deposit-bonus/ be left without pants in the USA, it’s enough to grunt, not to click at that time, or at least just give a hand to the lady when leaving the transport. Well, if you are such a fool that, at the sight of her elastic, the ass did not manage to restrain his admiration and said “wa …”, then ”… AU” will be negotiated already in court. You humiliated it, trampled, discreet and pay for it.

I represent this process. “Your honor, I can ask a question to this potential rapist?»Judge – looking aside (of course, not the first day married) – uh huh. “So, Mr., did you have the arrogance to look at my knees on June 29 at 16. 00?“ – „Well“. “What – well? I repeat the question „. „Well, looked“. “I have nothing more to add, your honor! The potential rapist looked at my knees, humiliating me with excessive visual contact, then took my eyes to the side, inflicting injuries with insufficient visual contact, and, I think that it is clear to everyone sitting in this hall that he actually raped me, deserves spurs here and now, but I am a Christian and therefore I ask you to rip off only $ 1 million and thirty cents from him, because I will have this amount for this amount.Restore your crippled ego „. And if the judge does not want to be the next victim, she will hurry to agree with her, because she had already looked a couple of times in his eyes and a couple of times on her knees, if they were wrong.

One is pleasing. In 1999, 12% of the men, whom the feminists were lowered with money, demanded that they compensate them with self -esteem, lost as a result of sexual harassment, and since then this percentage has been growing. We will slowly die! We begin to beat women with their own weapons ..

The fourth knife. I hate feminists because they are destructive.

A common joke says: „A real feminist must dig a tree, plant her husband and burn the house“. But how in any joke the share of truth lurks here. Feminists are in their nature destructive. These are women-destructors whose ideal is Novodvorskaya in the body of the Amazon. Meanwhile, a sociosexual intransigence blazing in their hysterical soul sometimes creates terrible things.

The ideas of Marxism and universal equality, which scored tiny cerebelles of unsatisfied women, are explosive. They are so large-scale that fuses in their wonderful heads burn out and the instinct of self-destruction sitting somewhere deep in the women is triggered-in the manner of lemmings behavior. Such a woman simply eagers to sacrifice herself to the altar of the revolution, burn in a world fire and rush under the hooves of history. But be sure to publicly. Why? Well, this is obvious – they either fell in love with the revolutionaries and thus attracted attention, or for the lack of interest in their persons fell in love with the revolution itself.

That is why the suffrazhists, feminists and tantrums always very willingly accepted terrorists, revolutionaries and sectarians of all stripes into their ranks. And all because the leaders of the parties (very shallow and hunting men) knew that they didn’t feed the women with bread, let something break out, blow up and tear off something to someone. In general, it is clear: they know how to make it bad (see. above), but break – do not build. And if you tear everything right, the place in history is provided. The names of Vera Zasulich, who shot at the mayor of Trepov, Sofia Perovskaya, firing at Alexander II, Fanny Kaplan, who injured Lenin, Charlotte Corde, who stabbed Marat, and, of course, Lorena Bobbit, who wolled his sleeping husband John and enriched the feminists with new terminas, remained in it- Bobitectomy: Oddowning a man in protest against a phallocratic society.

And it is undoubted that the feminists would have cut us all out, shot and gripped us all, but life, thank God, does not stand still. For the lack of radical terrorist organizations in the United States and Europe, feminists slapped their part on a sexual basis and now prefer not to shoot, but to undress in the courts. Although the essence of their actions has not undergone any changes – this is the struggle for great equality. But then they lie ..

The knife is fifth. I hate feminists for hypocrisy.

They lie feminists – in fact, they do not want any equalization in rights with men. And they want world domination. The main task of the Baby Party, like any other party, is the seizure of power. Feminists capture her according to the principle of „give a finger – I will bite off a hand“. They fought for suffrage – they were given it. They requested the right to have an abortion. They were allowed. But it seemed to them again that they were deprived. And they demanded high salaries, large positions – not on the principle of professional fit (then the feminists will definitely remain on the beans), but for gender.

And what happens? Over the past century, the women have received a lot of new rights and got rid of all old duties. The man has lost part of the previous rights, but did not lose a single obligation. If the feminists are so yelling about equal rights, then why, asks, when divorced, a modern woman should not a man anything, while a man is obliged to give her the lion’s part of the property, and in some countries (Italy, for example), also keep her ex -wife until she gets married again? If the feminists are so yelling about equal rights, then why men (according to statistics) spend in places of imprisonment twice as long than women convicted of the same crimes? If the feminists are so yelling about equal rights, then why is the level of suicide among men four times higher than in women? And why, finally, the male age is much shorter than the female? From a good life?

Want equality? Let’s put the sleepers together, roll the asphalt, unload wagons and clog piles. Want equality? Let’s dilute the money of organizations that sponsor such archiving studies as “a man is a tool for holding a women’s career” or “gender dysfunction into a phallocratic timelessness”. For years, we have been enthusiastically exploring the topics for years, such as “frigidity as a result of feminization” or “decrease in male self-assessment in the women’s team” and act with the results of these studies at international symposia somewhere on the islands of Bora-brow or in gonolulo.

Briefly speaking. Women’s struggle for equality – myth. Like female lawlessness. So women are arranged that they need everything at once and so that they have nothing to happen for it.

The sixth knife. I hate feminists for provocations and blackmail.

These two methods are as inextricable with feminism as Yin and Yan, like a horn and a pioneer, like Euro and EU and EU. If the cobblestone was the weapon of the proletariat, then the provocation and blackmail – the weapon of fighting for sexual equality. The feminist puts on a transparent blouse without a bra, a mini-skirt with a cut, openwork stockings, makes a causing makeup and goes to work, where he immediately attaches all the signs of Harrasion-from the views to compliments on the notes learned by the summary. After that, with a cry “I am not some of me here” sits down to scribble denunciations in all authorities. But answer what she was counting on? For whom she was so diligent to work? For aunt Tie Tony cleaning lady?

Women are generally prone to provocation. “Well, tell me that I’m a fool. Tell! You are silent? So I’m a fool, yes? Tell!“. – “You are a fool!““ Aaaa. »But feminists differ from ordinary women in that they will not calm down until they squeeze out all practical benefits from this scene. They have no shame. In the statement, they can easily blame the man both in that he does not wash the cup, and that he did not deliver her the number of orgasms necessary for strong female health. The end justifies the means – if there was no such slogan, the feminists would have invented it.

It is not surprising that looking at the feminists, wide women masses are accepted for the legal design of the results of their provocations. The first example that comes to mind is a scandalous story with tennis player Boris Becker and the Russian black woman Angela Ermakova. A girl with an alternative, frankly, appearance, came up with how to eat on a Christmas tree and fish. She herself stuck in a nightclub to a starving man (Bekker had a wife on demolitions), by her hunt she went to the toilet booth with him, where she satisfied him orally and … became pregnant. I am scared to think how much Angela trained before conveying the stars of the star in her beak to specialists who put her in the laid place. Now Becker pays for the gone as a result of such an extravagant concern of the child, the hard -willed alimony. Bekker, by golly I don’t feel sorry-of course, cattle. He did not die if he had been packed in anticipation of his wife without sex. But it’s not about him. A century ago, Angele would smear the gates of tar for such matters, and the very itself was deposited in feathers. A century ago, she would hide such a feat as the biggest sin. It turns out what the feminists have achieved? What they made of a woman a shameless bitch.

The seventh knife. I hate feminists for idiocy.

If all men are brothers in mind, then all women are sisters by madness.

Well, I would call himself a normal man with a penis? No. Unless he would have grown a penis instead of a head. And US feminists officially position themselves as „vaginal American“. If you proceed from this, then, as I understand it, this is their main achievement. There is nothing more to be proud of.

Their other terms, enriching the great and powerful English, are not much better: a prostitute is a “sexy worker”, a terrible one – “a woman with an alternative appearance”, frigidity – “heterosexual cellar”. Finally, the true masterpiece of feminist thought both in form and in content is “postcoiteal disagreement”. It is deciphered as “formal legal review of a woman of preliminary consent to sexual intercourse after its commission, or – the inconsistency of sexual intercourse of the expectations of a woman”. I translate into Russian: she gave, but she didn’t like it. And for this a non -vaginal American, of course, must also keep a response in court.

Feminists are fighting day and night with advertising using part of the female body. She humiliates them for mysterious reasons. As a result, in France, one of the companies was forced to advertise ladies‘ sandals by putting them on a naked man. Well, what a woman will go to buy sandals decorating hairy and crooked men’s legs? Only a complete feminist.

In Sweden, “McDonald’s” became a victim of equality. In his commercial, his wife, helping her husband gather to work, gives him a cup of coffee and ties a tie. The feminists at the sight of this disgrace immediately performed foam on the lips. The creators of the video were accused of vilely exploiting the stereotypical image of a housewife who humiliates a woman. And if she had poured coffee on his head? Then the feminists would surely consider the advertisement of a successful.

And again about the penis. For some reason, it does not give vaginal Americans peace. It turns out I underestimated the old man Freud. A woman really secretly envies the fact that the opposite sex has a member. Otherwise, the feminists would not have called it “enlarged clitoris” and “a substitute for the phalloimitator” (after such comparisons it is curious, they generally saw him?) and would not make persistent attempts to urin. That is, proudly standing, and not humiliatingly sitting.

This is not a joke. Frozen feminists have been conducting enhanced training for men’s pussies for several years, using cunning manipulations with fingers. They say that sometimes they even succeed. Less frostbitten and do not have the proper dexterity of fingers, use special devices. When I first heard about this, I was seized by an irresistible desire to tear out a penis, like Danko – a heart, and stretch it to the feminists with the words: “Take it for yourself, women! Let it make you happy „.

One thing is pleasing: Russian -speaking feminists should have enough mind not to torment themselves. The advantages of their physiological device are recognized by men and are fixed linguistic. How, swearing, we say about a bad thing? That’s right – … a good thing. And about the good? … Data. The conclusion is obvious.

The eighth knife. I hate feminists for taking the right to be a woman from women.

Feminists corrupt women. Not that they turn them all into lesbians. But they are morally decomposed – that’s for sure. And with benefit for yourself.

Women “with an alternative appearance” (and among the feminists are the majority) fight against the use of young long -legged and sexually attractive models in advertising, inspiring their gullible sisters that these beauty standards are humiliating evil. You see „offend the dignity of the rest of the women“. The shampoo, according to this logic, should be advertised by rare -haired, tights – crookedly, bra – flat -breasted, and gaskets – cunning. I’m thinking – not through the efforts of the feminists, terrible bald mannequins appeared in our windows?

Actress Sarah Gellar said: “When I hear about feminists, I immediately imagine women with unshaven legs”. And indeed: if you follow the logic of feminists, then the woman should completely stop taking care. The man does not shave his legs, why should she? A man does not paint his eyes, does not waste time on daily styling, does not smear the physiognomy with cream … more precisely – he did not paint, did not spend, did not smear. Now many of us do it, and the ranks of such men are growing. Where did they come from? According to the law of nature-if something has left somewhere, then in another place-certainly arrived. If feminists declare women with a strong floor, then men automatically become – weak.

Stupid pretty women fall on the bait of feminists, not thinking that their incredible social activity is only explained that the poor fellow with appearance was not lucky. Have the Novodvorsk appearance of Claudia Schiffer – but would she have gone to politics? Do not arise in Arbatova’s traces of a stormy life on a frying face – would she have become about her erratic sexual ties from the screen to broadcast? No, she would still be engaged in them. And now she has no choice but to shaking with sagging bulldoya cheeks, to tell in books and on the screen that many of these cheeks were sweet. And at the expense of these stories live. But a bad example is contagious-and now on the forums you can find a statement by a 20-year-old fool: “Now I am studying at the university, and when I’ll finish, I will become a professional feminist, like Masha Arbatova, I will, like her, do nothing and say that men are goats”. Comments are unnecessary ..

Before the appearance of feminists, a woman could always achieve everything she wanted. Not by violence and not through court, but with the help of love and affection. Before the appearance of feminists, women were able to clean our wallets perfectly – but they did it so charming that we were not offended by them. Yes, as Zhvanetsky said, during the day the political influence of women in the country was very low. But how everything magically changed at night!

That women lost thanks to feminists? There is not enough fingers to list! Compliments, poems to glory, admiring views, courtship, sincerely male desire to protect them from troubles, the opportunity to hide behind a male back, like behind a wall. What women acquired thanks to feminists? Ability to write an application to the court and write standing. You are sure that it was worth it?